2025 SUVs to Avoid: Models That May Not Be Worth Buying
Outdated Technology
In a world where technology drives much of our convenience, some SUVs lag behind with outdated systems. These models often come with infotainment systems that feel more like a relic from the past than a futuristic dashboard. Struggling with slow processors and limited connectivity features, they might not offer the seamless experience many drivers expect today. The lack of modern tech can make even routine tasks like navigation and smartphone integration unnecessarily cumbersome.
Example: The 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander base model still uses an older-generation infotainment system with laggy response times and no wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, making smartphone integration clunky compared to competitors.
Such SUVs often lack the advanced safety features that are becoming standard in newer models. Without adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, or autonomous emergency braking, these vehicles may not provide the peace of mind that technology-oriented buyers are seeking.
Example: The 2025 Jeep Wrangler Sport trim lacks standard lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control, which are features found on many similarly priced rivals like the Ford Bronco or Toyota 4Runner.
Poor Fuel Efficiency
With environmental concerns and fuel costs on the rise, efficient fuel consumption is a top priority for many prospective SUV buyers. Some 2025 models, however, still guzzle gas at alarming rates, which can be a significant drawback. These SUVs might boast impressive power, but the trade-off is frequent visits to the gas station.
Example: The 2025 Toyota Sequoia (non-hybrid variant) continues to deliver below-average fuel economy for its class, averaging just around 15 mpg combined—significantly less efficient than many competitors offering hybrid options.
Consumers today are more environmentally conscious, preferring vehicles that minimize their carbon footprint. SUVs with poor fuel efficiency not only impact your wallet but also contribute more to environmental degradation.
Limited Cargo Space
One of the main attractions of an SUV is its promise of ample cargo space, yet some models fall short of this expectation. These SUVs might look spacious from the outside, but their interiors tell a different story.
Example: The 2025 Mazda CX-50 has stylish design and great driving dynamics, but its cargo space lags behind rivals in the compact SUV segment, offering just 31 cubic feet behind the second row—less than models like the Honda CR-V or Toyota RAV4.
When the interior configuration doesn’t allow for flexible seating arrangements or easy cargo access, it can turn every trip into a game of Tetris.
Lack of Comfort and Ride Quality
Comfort is king when it comes to long drives, yet some 2025 SUVs fail to deliver a smooth and pleasant ride. These vehicles might have stiff suspensions that make every bump in the road a jarring experience.
Example: The 2025 Subaru Crosstrek Wilderness offers rugged off-road capability, but its firmer suspension can result in a choppier ride on city streets and highways compared to competitors like the Hyundai Tucson.
Additionally, interior design plays a crucial role in overall comfort, and some SUVs miss the mark with hard seats and minimal legroom.
High Maintenance Costs
High maintenance costs can quickly turn an SUV dream into a financial nightmare. Some models are notorious for needing frequent repairs, costly parts, or labor-intensive fixes that can make ownership expensive over time.
Example: The 2025 Land Rover Discovery continues the brand’s reputation for high maintenance and repair costs, with reliability ratings below average and parts that often require dealership servicing, pushing up long-term ownership expenses.
For budget-conscious buyers, an SUV that demands constant attention and expense can detract from the overall ownership experience.